"ITER Newsline" n'est pas disponible en français.
Pour lire les nouvelles en français, veuillez consulter "Les Actualités d'ITER", disponible ici...
![]() This is how Academician Boris Kadomtsev, future Director of the Kurchatov Institute Fusion Department, saw the Culham team on their arrival in Moscow. The summer before in Novosibirsk, at the Third International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research — the so-called "Plasma Olympics" — the Russians had presented results obtained in their T-3 Tokamak. The figures were so impressive they were hard to believe: according to the Kurchatov team, plasma temperature in T-3 had reached 10 million degrees and confinement time had exceeded 10 milliseconds — a full order of magnitude higher than in any other fusion machine. What was at stake for the whole fusion community was huge: if the numbers were right, it meant fusion was feasible — not tomorrow of course, but in a reasonably close future. ![]() The Culham Five: Harry Jones, the team's technician, Nicol Peacock, Mike Forrest, Derek Robinson and Peter Wilcock. At the height of the Cold War, the proposal was a daring one. The political and diplomatic implications and difficulties were considerable but both sides could expect large benefits from the venture: for the Russians, the confirmation of their "fantastic numbers" and for the British, a spectacular test field for the temperature measurement technique, known as "laser scattering", they had been applying to fusion plasmas for the past five years. In December 1968, less than six months after the Novosibirsk meeting, UKAEA had a team assembled: it consisted of Nicol Peacock, a highly respected spectroscopy specialist; Peter Wilcock, a brilliant technical innovator; Mike Forrest, a pioneer in the new laser scattering techniques; and Derek Robinson, a 27 year old theoretician, also with a laser scattering experience. In the eyes of the Britons, the Soviet Union was still a closed, mysterious and vaguely threatening world. "We were a bit scared", recalls Mike Forrest. "None of us had connections there. We really didn't know what to expect." The team and the 5 tons of equipment they had assembled settled in at the Kurchatov in the spring of 1969. "Everything looked rather crude", remembers Mike,"Now and thensome piece of equipment would stand out as quite sophisticated — military we thought..." T-3 had entered operation nine years earlier. It was the third "tokamak" that the Russians had built since the mid 1950s. If the machine's performance could be confirmed, the tokamak concept would change the course of fusion history. While getting used to day-to-day Russian life and to the "startled looks" they were getting when they walked through the Moscow streets, the British team set about adapting the equipment they had designed to the novel tokamak machine. This meant opening up the torus to fit "windows" and a collimator, setting up vibration-proof optical benches for the laser and aligning its beam through complex optical systems. The activity, remembers Mike Forrest was "frenetic" and because of the inevitable technical problems, the Russians were growing impatient. "Nerves," he says, "were getting frayed." ![]() Mike Forrest with the "hand-built" laser he began experimenting with in 1964. By early August, the British team had been able to aim their laser into some 88 plasma shots. Most of the temperatures they determined were in the 10 million degrees range, thus confirming Artsimovitch's announcement at the Novosibirsk conference a year earlier. The British laser scattering measurement on T-3 opened a new era in fusion research. In Princeton, the decision to convert the C-Stellarator into a tokamak was instantly made. Six months later, this Symmetric Tokamak (ST) matched the T-3 results. Other labs in the US, France, Japan, Germany decided to take the tokamak route. "Forty years later", says Mike Forrest, "we feel more than a tinge of pride in our 1969 achievement. After all, we had helped to get tokamaks recognized as the way forward for confined fusion research and, ultimately, to ITER." << return to Newsline #102 |
|||
| Pour tous commentaires ou questions, adressez vous à webmaster@iter.org. © 2013, ITER Organization | Terms of use | |||