Subscribe options

Select your newsletters:

Please enter your email address:

@

News & Media

Latest ITER Newsline

  • Port cells | All 46 doors in place

    In ITER, ordinary objects and features often take on an awesome dimension. Take the doors that seal off the port cells around the Tokamak for instance. Doors th [...]

    Read more

  • Toroidal field coils | Two make a pair

    One of the essential 'building blocks' of the ITER Tokamak is the pre-assembly of two toroidal field coils, one vacuum vessel sector and corresponding panels of [...]

    Read more

  • Industrial milestone | Cryostat manufacturing comes to an end in India

    With a flag-off ceremony on 30 June, India's L&T Heavy Engineering marked the end of an eight-year industrial adventure—the manufacturing of the ITER cryost [...]

    Read more

  • Local partners | A celebration for ITER's "vital artery"

    ITER is made possible through the work of thousands of scientists, engineers, workers of all trades and industries across the globe. It is also made possible by [...]

    Read more

  • Photo reportage | Travelling with a coil

    From the salt marshes of the inland sea Étang-de-Berre to the rolling hills around the ITER site (with a view of some of the highest alpine summits) an ITER con [...]

    Read more

Of Interest

See archived entries

Latest Lehman Review completed at US ITER

Lynne Degitz, US ITER

Brad Nelson presenting during the Lehman Review. (Click to view larger version...)
Brad Nelson presenting during the Lehman Review.
A team of engineering, science, and project management experts led by the US Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Project Assessment visited the US ITER Project Office (USIPO) this week to assess the status and progress towards Critical Decision 2 (CD-2) for US hardware contributions.

The Lehman Review committee received briefings and reviewed documents from the USIPO. The committee noted several key achievements, including significant progress on recommendations from the last review in August 2010 and paid particular attention to prerequisites for achieving CD-2 status, scheduled for summer 2012. CD-2 is a critical decision that indicates US DOE approval of the project's performance baseline.

Ned Sauthoff, UISPO manager, observed, "This review is helpful for us to continue to learn and to improve. Since our last review, we've made significant headway in resolving design uncertainties and advancing design progress. We will continue to strengthen our team and processes as we move on toward CD-2."

Ed Synakowski, associate director for the Office of Fusion Energy Sciences at the DOE Office of Science, commented, "The USIPO is to be congratulated for their tremendous effort. The work you have done since the last review is obvious."

Left to right: Lawrence Pedrotti, Louis Sas, John Bernardin, Jeff Hoy, Tom Vaneck, Yeong-Kook Oh, Jay Marx, Pepin Carolan, Johnny Moore, Kin Chao, Ken Stanfield, Ed Stevens, Jim Jeck, Larry Dardzinski, Mark Reichanadter, John AGlowienka, Steve Meador, Ed Synakowski, Bill Cahill, Aesook Byon, Daniel Lehman, John Haines, Roy Cutler, Don Rej, Sue King, Bob Kephardt, Peter Ladd, Joe Tuozzolo, Mark Champion, Sasha Zlobin and Walt Polansky. (Click to view larger version...)
Left to right: Lawrence Pedrotti, Louis Sas, John Bernardin, Jeff Hoy, Tom Vaneck, Yeong-Kook Oh, Jay Marx, Pepin Carolan, Johnny Moore, Kin Chao, Ken Stanfield, Ed Stevens, Jim Jeck, Larry Dardzinski, Mark Reichanadter, John AGlowienka, Steve Meador, Ed Synakowski, Bill Cahill, Aesook Byon, Daniel Lehman, John Haines, Roy Cutler, Don Rej, Sue King, Bob Kephardt, Peter Ladd, Joe Tuozzolo, Mark Champion, Sasha Zlobin and Walt Polansky.
The committee concluded its report by congratulating USIPO management and recommending attention to confirming a self-consistent baseline as fundamental preparation for future reviews.

The successful three-day review was led by Daniel Lehman, who has served as the Director of Project Assessment for DOE Office of Science since 1991. He has been recognized worldwide for developing a comprehensive review system to ensure DOE's large science projects are delivered on time and on budget. Large projects such as US ITER typically undergo review once or twice each year.

The purpose of the review is to provide independent project assessment that pays particular attention to organization and management practices. This type of review offers a reality check to project leadership and helps projects overcome barriers to addressing challenges. Preparing for regular reviews also aids large-scale projects in focusing on their current status and targeting necessary steps for the future. A successful review adds to a project's credibility and can signal to stakeholders that the project is on track.


return to the latest published articles