A twice in a lifetime opportunity

 

 

 

The year 1997 marked the end of the great DT adventure, however ... at least as concerns the 20th century—JET had completed its campaign and budgetary constraints in the US led to the dismantling of TFTR. No further campaign was planned, with the exception of an experiment with trace tritium at JET in 2003.

 

The fusion community had glimpsed the Holy Grail; its members would have to wait for ITER to bring it home. But in 1997, ITER was still many years from realization ...

 

"It's been almost 20 years. It was a fantastic experience and, at the time, I didn't think my generation would have another chance to participate in DT experiments," says Xavier Litaudon who, as a young physicist, was part of the 1997 campaign at JET.

 

Litaudon, who until recently headed the Heating and Confinement Department at CEA's Institute for Magnetic Fusion Research (IRFM), is a lucky man. Not only will he soon have another shot at "real" fusion but he will manage the European participation and scientific exploitation of the 2017 DT campaign as head of the EUROfusion ITER Physics Department. (1)

 

Since it entered operation in 1983, the European tokamak JET has always been at the heart of fusion research. Now, equipped with an ITER-like beryllium wall, an ITER-like tungsten divertor and upgraded heating systems, it is centre stage more than ever: "JET has become a much more ITER-like machine and will continue to provide answers to the big questions that are essential for ITER operation," he says.

 

In July, the European Commission and the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, signed a EUR 283 million contract that insures that JET will be financed until the end of 2018.

 

 

The machine is now shut down and will restart in May 2015 to resume its scientific campaign in September with a refurbished ITER-like ion cyclotron resonance heating antenna and an optimized pellet injector (frozen deuterium pellets are injected into the plasma to mitigate instabilities known as ELMs).

 

The "real thing" —implementing the actual fusion fuels deuterium and tritium—will only begin when all machine components have been commissioned, the operating scenario developed at full fusion performance, staff trained, safety measures checked and diagnostics systems adjusted. This will take the better part of two years.

 

JET has changed a lot in 20 years, becoming more and more like ITER, and so has the world of fusion research. Fuelled by conceptual advances and the feedback from dozens of fusion machines, considerable progress has been made in understanding plasma behaviour and new "scenarios" have been developed, leading to better sustained plasma performance. (JET is collectively used by more than 350 scientists and engineers from all over Europe.)

 

"We want to demonstrate that what we have observed with deuterium plasmas can be extrapolated to DT," says Litaudon. "We will be operating JET as if it were ITER. In that early phase, plasma current (~4 MA) and magnetic field (~4 Tesla) parameters will be comparable in both machines..."

 

JET is the only operating machine licenced for tritium but it is not totally "ITER-like." Its smaller plasma volume (~ 100 m3 as compared to ITER's 840 m3) will limit fusion performance and its conventional (non-superconducting) coils and the fact that both its wall and divertor are not actively cooled will impact the duration of the plasma shots.

 

However, the feedback from DT experiments in JET will be decisive for validating the ITER scenarios and readying the young generation of engineers and scientists for ITER operation. "It's a matter of time and money," says Xavier Litaudon. "If we gain one year on the learning curve, ITER can save a few hundred million euros..."